Table 1 presents the results of experts who are familiar with the teaching management functions of clients. Table 1 Content Validity Agreement Scores (Hallinger, 1982) When assessing the validity of the instrument`s content, each element assigned on a partial scale was required to obtain an average minimum agreement of 0.80 from the group of advisors. Contracts are valuable if used correctly. Write down these items to make sure your agreements are always protected. Error – If both parties to an agreement have an error as to a fact essential to the agreement, the agreement is null and void. A misperception such as the value of the thing that is the subject of the agreement is not considered a mistake in fact. A unilateral error, that is, an error in the mind of a single party, does not affect the validity of the contract.1. For a legal consideration and purpose – the reflection or purpose is illegal, if (1) It is prohibited by law,2) If such a species, if it were allowed, it would not be the provisions of a law, (3) It is fraudulent,4 The court considers it immoral,(5) The court considers it to be contrary to public order. Any agreement whose consideration or purpose is illegal is void.1. not explicitly declared void.
Agreements are extinguished when considerations and rebuttals are partly illegal.2. An agreement without consideration is invalid, unless it is written and recorded, or is a promise to compensate for something done, or is a promise to pay a prescribed debt.3 Agreement on the withholding of marriage. Any agreement to restrict the marriage of a person other than that of a minor is invalid. It is the legal policy to prevent agreements that restrict the freedom of marriage. If a party is prevented from marrying, marrying or marrying for a specified period, or marrying a person or group of people, the agreement is null and void.4 Trade restrictions. Any agreement that prevents the exercise of a legitimate profession, trade or activity of any kind is, in this respect, non-sharp.5 Agreement on limiting judicial proceedings. Any agreement by which a party, by which it limits the rights of the contracting parties or with respect to a contract, is absolutely limited by the usual judicial proceedings or limits the time within which it can therefore assert its rights is, in this respect, not applicable.6. Uncertainty agreements. Agreements of unsure importance or that can be made safe are cancelled.7.
Betting agreements. Agreements as a bet are not considered; and no legal action is taken for the recovery of something allegedly won on bet or entrusted to a person offered by the result of a game or other uncertain event on which a bet is made. (Bet that..) means bets or games of chance). However, some prices for horse racing are excluded. With respect to trade agreements, it is generally accepted that the parties intended to enter into a contract. It is largely wrong to believe that a transaction must be made in writing for a transaction to be contractually valid. That is not the case. Indeed, most transactions for which a party can claim damages as a result of an infringement are oral agreements. They can be a single language for the conditions that determined the need for the agreement or standard clauses, often used in contract law. Regardless of this, both contracting parties must have confidence that the conditions imposed by the treaty are legally valid and protect their rights and offer security guarantees in the event of disagreement during the term of the contract. However, there are other agreements in which the contract must be considered valid in writing, so that a court can determine the intentions of the party at the time of entry into force and not let the case exist in a “he said” situation.
An example could be the sale of a car between the owner of the car and another party. Once the sale is complete, if the buyer claims that the owner of the car had promised to repair the brakes, but not about this written promise, it is unlikely that the court